Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medo Abowarda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medo Abowarda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Googling turns up nothing useful. Article appears to be autobiographical WP:AUTO WP:SPA WP:COI. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. All of the references are from the company website, which doesn't have an article either. -- Luke (Talk) 20:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no coverage in reliable sources for this person. Also searching for this company and the software turned up nothing either. -- Whpq (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Msnicki (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do they use the 26 letter alphabet we do over there? How is his name spelled in Egyptian? Does Google news archive include sources in that language? Someone can ask the guy if he has been interviewed or covered anywhere. Dream Focus 16:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep References are included from the Medosoft Corporation website and from other sources as well, information in this article verified, name in Arabic was added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.240.37 (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

24.15.240.37 (talk) has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Medo3337 (talk · contribs). Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medo3337. Msnicki (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All references (aside from the first-party sources) only pertains to the subject's product and not on the subject himself (not to mention those links are software download sites). Also the two "product review" links are blocked by Trend Micro. E Wing (talk) 02:21, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is inconceivable that any notable currently active IT professional would have such a complete lack of coverage on the Internet: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ The company and the owner are not located in Egypt, the company is not Egyptian nor Arabian which is the main reason you won't find information by searching about the person in Arabic language.

There are also no sources found by searching for the subject's name in English, the language of his web site, as shown by the links in the nomination statement. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - The Corporation itself verify that the information here is true through the webpage http://www.medosoft.net/Medo/bio.php which appears one of the references.
~~Keep~~ - The Corporation and the software products are well covered over the internet through hundreds of websites, search for "Medosoft Inventory" and "Auto Capture PC". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.252.73 (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - Please !vote only once. -- Whpq (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
24.15.252.73 has been blocked for being an obvious sockpuppet. Dream Focus 17:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The person is the owner of a known company, the company itself verify that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.244.194 (talk) — 24.15.244.194 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete. Purely self-promotion. References to own company website don't prove notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The author of the article, Medo3337 (talk · contribs), has been indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts and a one-week hard block placed on the IP range 24.15.240.0/20 used by his sockpuppets. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medo3337. Msnicki (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.