Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical claims in Scientology doctrine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:20, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Medical claims in Scientology doctrine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

By its very nature, the article is based on original research and synthesis. Insufficient RS to support notability or verifiability. Tgeairn (talk) 04:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that there is merit in an article about Scientology and medicine, but this article will need a lot of work from people who can very, very carefully edit it so it doesn't come across as a WP:SOAPBOX one way or another. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with TokyoGirl79 - I can imagine that there could be enough information for a substantial article, but this particular article is not it. I also note that this article was recently greatly reduced in content by a single editor (User:Tgeairn). There isn't any related discussion on the talk page so I'm not clear on what the consensus is on the page. I could agree with a delete or to merge with Scientology_beliefs_and_practices LaMona (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:53, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This is relevant to the ongoing Scientology vs. the Internet phenomenon, and is becoming more relevant with the new HBO documentary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonboy54 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pretty much anything discussed in reliable sources refers to some spin on mental illness and psychosomatic illness, and that falls under Scientology and psychiatry. - Location (talk) 04:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as User:Location says, it is a superfluous expansion/duplication of Scientology and psychiatry.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. After further research, I agree with the two users above and I've changed my position. Moonboy54 (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.