Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediaocean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mediaocean

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability; sources are either mere notices or press releases DGG ( talk ) 00:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Article from Wall Street Journal already included. Notability is firmly established with sources that need to be added to article. Forbes, Advertising Age, Business Insider, Yahoo Finance, some in The Guardian. Coverage of Pandora integration in Billboard Magazine. Also pre 2012 it was called Donovan Data Systems, and there is an article on that company I am going to merge right now, plus more coverage on its pre-2012 business. JTdale ^Talk 10:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep enough sources for establishing notability. Noteswork (talk) 06:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most of the article was not relevant to the company: it was about prior companies. So, I removed the irrelevant content, which made it a stub, but the sources left still establish notability. I am One of Many (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.