Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medecision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Medecision

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

articles fails GNG; a BEFORE search finds a plethora of press releases and incidental mentions but nothing passing INDEPENDENT or SIGCOV Chetsford (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ATZNA 19:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. ATZNA 19:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, notability not established, 2 refs in the article which say little, google and gnews bringing back routine press and company news, created by an spa 3 years ago and little content added since. Szzuk (talk) 21:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.