Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MechWarrior4 terms, definitions and abbreviations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 20:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MechWarrior4 terms, definitions and abbreviations

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a place for original research. This list has all the trappings of a game guide, and is going to have a seriously hard time being sourced by reliable sources. Aside from being listed in our list of glossaries, the only non-user-space link to this article comes from the online-play secetion of MechWarrior 4: Mercenaries, which is itself a jungle of original resource. Consequentially 06:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. MER-C 06:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge back into MechWarrior 4: Mercenaries - looks like it was a fork. --- RockMFR 16:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 18:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT a dictionary/game guide/collection of indiscriminate info. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete: None of this stuff is verified at all, and what stuff I do recognise from the Mechwarrior universe (IE the hybrid-russian spoken by the clans) is likely a copyvio of the original FASA materials. 69.210.54.31 03:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Indiscriminate information, fancruft. Another article someones done solely for the sake of having an article. The Kinslayer 10:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Passes the Fails everything test SkierRMH,05:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above, and, as a life long BattleTech and MechWarrior die hard fan, the article is of no practical value. Most of the terms are covered in the MW4:Mercs manual, MP readme, and the rest are covered by nearly all gaming guides (including the ones I wrote for MW2/MW3). So deleting, not merging, the article it would not "contribute to ignorance" (my personal test for deleting stuff on WP). --MegaBurn 23:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Davidpdx 09:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.