Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowbrook North, Iowa
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Meadowbrook North, Iowa[edit]
- Meadowbrook North, Iowa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unencyclopedic.
Article is one sentence long *Kat* (meow?) 02:58, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: A search for this term on Google Maps does not bring up any results. It looks like it may just be a small neighborhood. --Andrew (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The only places I could find which even mention Meadowbrook North are real estate websites, most of which list it as a neighborhood of Bondurant or West Des Moines. In my experience, real estate websites are not reliable sources, since they tend to use location data from other sources including Wikipedia itself, so the article probably fails WP:V. Either way, it fails the general notability guideline, and neighborhoods are not inherently notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 06:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find squat about this in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.