Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonalds lawsuit 1964
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was that the article has been speedily deleted by User:Ben W Bell. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
McDonalds lawsuit 1964[edit]
- McDonalds lawsuit 1964 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I cannot find any evidence that this is a notable lawsuit, or even that it happened. I tried a few different combinations of terms while searching google and could not find any writing about this case; the author has not been able to add detail or sources that would confirm the accuracy of this short article. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's not enough detail here to try to verify it, and no sources are provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Not one source. Radioinfoguy (talk) 03:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 2 all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed DELETE - per WP:RS, per WP:N, per WP:V, per WP:ARRGGH. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find anything to suggest that the single sentence article in question isn't complete crap. --Carbonrodney (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not going to speedy it because I'm going to assume good faith. However, the author had better come up with something good real soon. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Being from Kentucky, I vaguely recall hearing tales about this, but there's not enough information here for anyone to expand the article unless they know more of the details than appear in the article. The event is probably notable, and the article could definitely be recreated, but hopefully in a much more useful and expandable form. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 14:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.