Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonalds' Canada Menu
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect. I merged the non-listy information into the main McDonald's menu items#Canada section, in addition to the existing sentence. If you feel I missed something that could have been merged, please pluck it out of the McDonalds' Canada Menu article behind the redirect. Cheers, Daniel Bryant 12:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
McDonalds' Canada Menu[edit]
- McDonalds' Canada Menu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is definitely not encyclopedic. John Reaves (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not encyclopedic and fails WP:NOT#UNENC. Sr13 (T|C) 23:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to McDonald's menu items which was kept in January of this year. It is encyclopedic to cover the products offered by a major corporation like McDonald's including their regional menus. That said, I see no reason why this should be off on its own. FrozenPurpleCube 23:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to McDonald's menu items. I agree that this is a good idea, and that there is information in this article that is quality, and should be kept. Greenboxed 00:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As you are the author of this article, Greenboxed, you are in the best position to find the items worth keeping and to merge them in to the parent article. (aeropagitica) 00:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree with you, and would be happy to merge the article. Greenboxed 22:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to McDonald's menu items per concensus thus far - particularly, in the regional section. McDonald's in Canada isn't that much different from McDonalds down here south of the Great White North so as to have its own menu items article. --Dennisthe2 06:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to McDonald's menu items. There are distinct items lacking any coverage such as the trial Bacon Ranch McChicken and the deli sandwiches. –Pomte 02:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom. Could be used in WP:NOT for what Wikipedia isn't and (shouldn't be). I wouldn't even mind if the menu items article was AfDed :) "items lacking coverage such as the trial Bacon ranch McChicken"??! Why don't we give the link to McD's website and let the webmasters paid by the company elaborate on the subject? Come on people, let's be serious :)) Baristarim 04:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, I totally agree with you in sentiment. Maybe Wikipedia shouldn't contain this sort of info in your view, but then the millions of people shouldn't have made the mistake of eating up all these items either. There's even a news article on a related item: "wow, the bacon ranch chicken sandwich must be really irresistible!" but What I actually think is, `wow, the new spokesperson for McDonald's is an idiot" [1] The main article was kept 2 months ago, but you're free to nominate it again. But while it exists, we should merge this info so undue weight isn't given to American items. –Pomte 09:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, good point. Since the original article was kept, merge it is :) Baristarim 09:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, I totally agree with you in sentiment. Maybe Wikipedia shouldn't contain this sort of info in your view, but then the millions of people shouldn't have made the mistake of eating up all these items either. There's even a news article on a related item: "wow, the bacon ranch chicken sandwich must be really irresistible!" but What I actually think is, `wow, the new spokesperson for McDonald's is an idiot" [1] The main article was kept 2 months ago, but you're free to nominate it again. But while it exists, we should merge this info so undue weight isn't given to American items. –Pomte 09:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per consensus Thewinchester (talk) 05:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.