Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayo Association Dublin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mayo Association Dublin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relatively small non-profit organisation with a limited scope which is neither national nor international in scope, and which is not nationally well-known (failing WP:NONPROFIT). The subject organisation has also not been the primary topic of any significant or material coverage (failing WP:GNG). Any coverage that is available is ROTM stuff. Like reprinted speeches from club dinners or book launches. Or trivial coverage in hyper-local outlets of which the subject is not the primary topic (like reprinted press-releases about events the club sponsors/runs). Or which trades on inherited notability (like PR surrounding a politician's attendance at a club event). I can find no substantive coverage which features the subject as its main topic. Which, in all honesty, doesn't seem especially surprising.... Guliolop ez (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is difficult to find anything to add to Guliolopez's very clear summary. Before reading this page I had already done my own checking of the cited sources and my own search for further sources, and I independently came to the same conclusion as Guliolopez. The cited sources are exactly as Guliolopez describes them, and the outcome of my searches were dominated by the club's own web site, its FaceBook Twitter and LinkedIn pages, trivial local coverage, etc. A local club of local interest, and not remotely notable in Wikipedia's terms. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and JamesBWatson. Spleodrach (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rationale given above. Ktrimi991 (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.