Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maycon Devon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Consensus is for deletion. Meio2934 is new to Wikipedia so it’s understandable that they are not familiar with Wikipedia’s multitude of policies and guidance. For advice on Articles for Creation, ask at Articles for Creation help desk or one of the regulars there; for general advice, try the Teahouse. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maycon Devon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable musical artist whose work has not achieved any measure of notability, despite the peacock prose in the article about his "innate talent" and "artistic prowess". Mixed in with links to his church and school are various minor mentions in low quality sources. A Google / Google News search didn't turn up anything meaningful. Alansohn (talk) 12:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Brazil, and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 12:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 12:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sign of notability of any flavour. Likely vanity autobio, speedied twice already in the past day or two. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing notable about this musical artist. Flowery text. PROMO. Sourcing used is all in non-Rs and I find none. Oaktree b (talk) 13:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sourcing is imdb (when he's not even an actor), wikipedia and instagram, among others. Just don't. Oaktree b (talk) 13:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I will be charitable with WP:TOOSOON. Good luck to the kid as he gets started, but releasing a song yourself doesn't get you into an encyclopedia. The article history shows some shenanigans with re-redirecting and re-draftifying, so WP:SALT might be in order as well. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WAYTOOSOON in this case. Barely has any music published, let alone available. Oaktree b (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He has information on google, and a knowledge panel. he released his debut single in all streaming platforms as an indie. he also played a role in a play. Meio2934 (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
he still developing, there are ton of pages with little context information's about other artists that are also developing. Meio2934 (talk) 21:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meio2934 WP:GHITS & WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 21:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see your reply, and All I say is that there is no sense on deleting a page that still developing while still has information about who the article is talking about. Meio2934 (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: and possibly snow close per failing WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 21:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I really don't think that is necessary, as i said the page still developing Meio2934 (talk) 21:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Meio2934: - Welcome to Wikipedia and we hope you continue to contribute. However, you must become familiar with the rules for when/if someone qualifies for an article. Study the notability rules, and the additional requirements for musicians. These are unrelated to the current state of the article or the existence of this kid's one song. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not even remotely close to passing MUSICBIO or GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I uderstand the Wikipedia policies about articles creation an criteria, I’ve moved the article for draft so in the mean time the draft can be edited without hurting the Wikipedia with non- notable articles. Meio2934 (talk) 19:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please stop moving it around, articles shouldn't be moved during an open AfD anyway. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What is the point of a deletion discussion if the article is going to be deleted Anyways because it doesn’t meet “notability” criteria ?. Second, isn’t it easier to just move the article to draft and leave it there or something ?. And if the article is so bad why don’t speedy delete it ? Meio2934 (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was speedily deleted, but you just recreated it. Instead of speedying it again, letting this AfD run its course will help establish community consensus, which in itself is valuable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have anything against my work ? Every article every draft I send for review you always reject and give any exactness of why it is being rejected. The draft that I sent of Benji Krol for example. I added 21 existent factual evidences of News articles listing the author’s names in each one of them. And I wrote again the whole article, and I sent it for review. And you rejected without even looking the changes I had made in the draft. The only you stated was how the draft had been rejected before. And when I sent you a message requesting you to analyze it right because I added news articles you did not responded. It is not my fault that the other editors didn’t added the right news sources. But I edited and I did. All I wanted was for someone to review and tell me why in the new circumstances of the already edited article, was rejected. Meio2934 (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This page is for discussing whether the Devon article should be deleted or kept, not for airing your wider grievances with me or the AfC system. Feel free to drop by my talk page or the AfC Help Desk (but preferably not both), and we can discuss those matters there. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, I will Meio2934 (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG by a mile. Theroadislong (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.