Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May 2016 United States storm complex
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh666 17:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- May 2016 United States storm complex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not the news. Just another run of the mill storm. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – Run-of-the-mill storms don't tend to break all-time records. Dustin (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep or merge - Keep per WP:IDEALSTUB, as this storm complex has set all time records in both Texas and Oklahoma. If the article cannot be kept, it should be merged per WP:CHEAP to Floods in the United States: 2001–present. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand- I recently renamed this article from 2016 Oklahoma floods per a discussion on the article's Talk page in order to better reflect the flooding's impact on other states including Texas which is already in the article text. Quite frankly, if this article survives AfD, I would recommend that it be substantially expanded to reflect its impact across several states.--TommyBoy (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.