Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxpanda
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Maxpanda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
blatant promotion on Wikipedia. its not brochure or blog for products as it has been done here. No notable coverage on media. Light2021 (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete lack of significant mention in sources cited qualifies article for failing WP:CORPDEPTH. A g-search turned up no meaningful results not already cited. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTYELLOW — fortunavelut luna 07:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.