Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximum Impact
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 13:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maximum Impact[edit]
- Maximum Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This topic about a UK hardcore record label appears to fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Searches in news and book sources are not yielding coverage. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This appears to be an indie label and their artists are indie as well, I searched "Maximum Impact Records" at Google News but found nothing so I added "DJ Seduction" and found one minor mention here and two Music Week links here. As my last resort, I searched the main Google engine but found nothing despite detailed searches. SwisterTwister talk 21:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Oooh I love these. They're basically trying to get a toehold on the encyclopedia, filling out their redlinks by claiming inherited notability. If I had a dime for each of these I'd buy me a new coatrack. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP and WP:MUSIC and kill it with fire. §FreeRangeFrog 22:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per Froggy above. Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails to meet the general notability criteria. — ṞṈ™ 22:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking independent sources. If the article is significantly improved, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.