Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximilian Schulz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 19:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maximilian Schulz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL since the subject has never won any national or state level elections Padavalam🌂 ► 16:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Padavalam🌂 ► 16:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Padavalam🌂 ► 16:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Padavalam🌂 ► 16:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being spokesman for the youth wing of a political party is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:NPOL — but this is referenced almost entirely to content self-published by his own political party, such as its own website and internal newsletter and directory entries, which is not how you get a person over WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold a notable political role. The only source that clearly comes from a genuine media outlet independent of the party is just a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose core subject is something else, which doesn't help. And the German article (which should probably also be deleted, but I can't read or write German in order to navigate their deletion process) is just using the exact same footnotes and shows no evidence whatsoever of anything else, so there aren't any sources that can just be pulled over from de to salvage this. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - With respect to WP:NPOL, he has not even run for any office that would give rise to notability, nor does any of the sourcing establish WP:GNG. -- Whpq (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.