Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxblizz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maxblizz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite claims of notability due to being in the same league as Deadline Hollywood and Collider, which allows this to escape WP:A7, I'm not seeing anything towards WP:GNG or WP:NWEB. I could not find any in-depth coverage from a reliable and independent source. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Advert/Promotion WP:G11 Onmyway22 talk 11:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional content. Mann Mann (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NWEB. Also, there is not a single realiable source. Own website and the youtube channel link. Behind the moors (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the first person and peacock words are a give-away: conflict of interest editing that might merit a speedy delete. W Nowicki (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't qualify WP:NMEDIA. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:G11. This is a non-notable enterprise. Additionally, this article seems to well be written as if it were the company's own website, using first-person to describe the company's vision and office location. I'd honestly not be surprised if there were copyvio in there as well. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: half of the article comes verbatim from the company's website. I've tagged the related revisions for revdel. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.