Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max & Bianca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Max & Bianca[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Music duo who had one charting single in Australia (#92) six years ago and do not appear to have anything notable since Allied45 (talk) 09:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:BAND. I have supplied content and references. The subject has been described by multiple sources and they have a national charting single.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has nationaly charted. Seems to be enough to satisfy WP:NEXIST to get over the GNG line. Aoziwe (talk) 10:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, concur with Shaidar cuebiyar the article satisfies WP:BAND. Improved referencing satisfies WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.