Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mawson Lakes Soccer Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mawson Lakes Soccer Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur soccer club, playing in the 4th division of a fully amateur competition. Doesn't come close to passing notability guidelines. A second club (Pontian Eagles Soccer Club) is nominated for the same reason. - J man708 (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A Google search for ("mawson lakes soccer club") turned up no independent in-depth coverage. Searching Google News and Google News Archives for the same phrase yielded zero hits. Widening the Google News searches to ("mawson lakes" soccer club) produced nothing that'd tend to establish notability. Appears to fail WP:GNG. — Ammodramus (talk) 23:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification. I am !voting to delete Mawson Lakes Soccer Club; I haven't looked into Pontian Eagles Soccer Club, and question whether it should be included in this AfD, since it might well be the case that one's notable and the other isn't. — Ammodramus (talk) 23:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CLUB. WWGB (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 14:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 14:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CLUB. Simione001 (talk) 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 4th division amateur has no notability. LibStar (talk) 04:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom Nick-D (talk) 05:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 15:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW DELETE' as there's simply convincingly better improvement so WP:TNT is better is ever available. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:CLUB and WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete - fails WP:CLUB and WP:FOOTYN –Davey2010^Talk 00:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fail WP:GNG. Both have a few mentions in local papers in Adelaide - according to Factiva and Ebsco Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre - but not sufficient to be considered significant coverage. Hack (talk) 13:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.