Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matzav.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matzav.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Of the sources, several do not mention the source at all, and the rest are passing mentions, or the website itself. This may be related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matzav (2nd nomination). Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 08:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG. I am unable to find any sources talking about this website, only the website promoting itself. BTW in my own research, I find that the website merely copies from other sources, like Yeshiva World News, and even from Wikipedia articles. Yoninah (talk) 11:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing i the article to support a claim of notability and I couldn't find anything more in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This seems to be the third attempt to shoehorn this into an article and I can't see how it is notable.

author note: I've reformatted to begin that they're primarily a news aggregator, but that they do develop their own material which has been picked up by The Jewish Press (Matzav.com claims 4 part-timers get their non-aggregaion "scoops") and a number of Jewish organizations and specialty sites (JLaw.com).

P.S. It's not the 3rd time, only second-and-a-half: In the original Matzav article about the "situation" (meaning of Matzav), this topic (Matzav.com, the site) was the tail. Now it's the turn of Matzav to be the dog-like tail: Matzav.com doesn't need [[Matzav] to stand tall, OK, on the shoulders of .. stream-of-consciousness postscript ... perhaps it's still (notable 2008 cited comment) "up and coming. Keep an eye on it." Pi314m (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Confirming that the added sources do not constitute significant coverage: We're looking for secondary sources that show the importance of the topic by covering the publication itself in depth, not simply citing it. czar 11:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.