Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattias Svensson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mattias Svensson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP about a Swedish political writer has no independent sources, and the one (non-independent) source in the references is a deadlink. It is possible that there are sources in Swedish that I can't read, and if so I'm happy to see those added so the article can be kept. However, I looked to the the equivalent article on Swedish Wikipedia for pointers, and it is unreferenced and even shorter than the article here. RL0919 (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per nom at first. I have now changed my vote to Keep per the !vote below. It is correct.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While mostly active in Sweden, he's a rather high-profile and active commentator who gets regular attention in national media. (Agree that the svwiki article is quite poor, will have a look at it.) Tomas e (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.