Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Tuck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bullet for My Valentine. Per WP:MUSICBIO (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:33, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Tuck[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Matt Tuck has gain no notability outside of Bullet for my Valentine, there is only four sources on this article, one is last.fm and another is a facebook community page, which is wikipedia text on facebook, unreliable and circle sourcing don't count for anything. Jonjonjohny (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bullet for My Valentine. Per WP:MUSICBIO: "members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases." At this time, I don't believe he meets that criteria, as I'm finding no significant coverage demonstrating individual notability. Gongshow ^Talk 19:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
THIS DOES NOT NEED DELETED, DO NOT DELETE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.111.153.57 (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I have to agree with Gongshow, a redirect here makes a lot of sense. Usual Caveats apply, as... well, as usual. If the subject's solo career takes off, then an individual article might be appropriate. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Does not seem to be separately notable from his band. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.