Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Nunn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 18:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Nunn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

written like advertisement and cannot be seen notability Endrabcwizart (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Basketball, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete between a press release, unverified claims and some marginal attention to what seems to be a self-awarded title of Australia's biggest advertisement agency, I see no notabilty as per WP:GNG to make the article stand. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - was already thinking about PROD before this AfD was created. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 18:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – if it looks like an advertisement, feels like an advertisement, and reads like an advertisement, it's probably an advertisement. But also, fails GNG. SportsGuy789 (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Basketball coach for the U20 team isn't notable, rest feels like fluff. 120 employees is a rather small company, so we aren't likely to find much of anything about this person. I don't find coverage beyond confirmation of his sports coaching, simple mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rlendog (talk) 03:46, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Primarily because it feels very much like a paid promotional article (particularly in light of the author's contributions). Nunn himself does garner some coverage (eg in the AFR and Media Week's top 50 media agency directors) however it doesn't feel like there's sufficient to meet GNG. Cabrils (talk) 01:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.