Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Lynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Lynn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Amended added more book reviews and use of his opinions in research and books. As a regular writer for several news outlets, and his finance writing he is notable.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 10:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lynn evidently writes for prominent publications, but I can't find any evidence that his works have won significant critical attention, or that a work of his writing has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, and I don't see how any of the other WP:NAUTHOR criteria apply. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 14:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 14:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.