Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Kingshott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Kingshott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical article of person who is not notable Bkingshott (talk) 07:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is registered on IMDB, is engaged in pre-production on a film project being directed by Michael J. Bassett, a major director, and has received multiple appearances on film-related websites:
The subject also appears in numerous news articles performed by a Google News search and appears in dozens of articles accessible by a Google search, as well as appearing in the top 3.
The article therefore meets the following proposed arguments for inclusion:
- The subject has multiple, externally-sourced references.
- The subject appears on numerous film-related websites.
- The subject continues to receive publicity through news and regular web searches.
- This article has the potential to improve at a later date when additional information is available. At such a time the article is unlikely to remain autobiographical as per the terms of the original observation.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.245.43.66 (talk) 09:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While there may be a lot of mentions of this project none are that significant and would not yet (at first look) be enough for me for the future film so he doesn't satisfy WP:ENT as a film writer. The mentions of him in the above links I have access to are of the extremely trivial nature so lacks coverage for WP:N. The subject is not recieving the coverage, the project is. That the article has the potential to improve is crystal ball thinking and that is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Also vioaltes WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As I see no evidence that its author User:ThePenguin1 is either Matthew Kingshott or anyone attached to the Kingshot film, I do not see this short, encyclopedic, and sourced article as being a violation of WP:NOT. That said however, the article and topic are simply WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.