Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Hardy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 03:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Hardy[edit]

Matthew Hardy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this one in the Unsourced BLP category. There's a good reason why this article has no reliable sources. That's because there are no sources to be found. Not on the first three pages of Google, not on Google News, nowhere. This is an obvious fail of WP:ENT and GNG. 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree. It is not notable. --Bduke (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article lacks any reliable sources. IMDb is not reliable and seeks to be totally comprehensive, while we do not consider every person who ever had a credited part in a commerical TV or film production to be notable. His website clearly cannot be used to show he is notability either. Wikipedia is not meant to be a lightly annotated directory to all websites.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - mentioned in passing here but I can't find anything to support a notability claim Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.