Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Ezzy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:14, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Ezzy[edit]

Matthew Ezzy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:GNG is not met by routines sports reporting and WP:NHOCKEY is not met by playing in lower tier IIHF events. Papaursa (talk) 03:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 15:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.