Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Wedel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Wedel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NPROF. A search does turn up lots of reliable sources which mention the subject, but all of them are passing mentions, with no significant coverage of the subject. AryKun (talk) 11:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=AElExF8AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra Citations 1793, h-index 22, i10-index 27. And at the Library of Congress: this search Eastmain (talk • contribs) 12:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Reasonable citations in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enos733 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Eastmain.4meter4 (talk) 03:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.