Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Mumford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The one delete argument doesn't really make sense to me. This nomination was not about martial arts, and if he's "well known in the skateboarding world" then he is notable. Geschichte (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Mumford[edit]

Matt Mumford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORTS. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Less notable sources used, seems to be an important element of Australian skater culture, but not enough proven to warrant an article. Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Matt has been on the front cover of a magazine and is well known in the skateboarding world but there are hundreds of martial artists that have been on the front cover of martial arts magazines that are well known in their fighting style who are not notable. Without any national news articles on Matt notability can’t be established. Australianblackbelt (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Significant coverage in Thrasher and Transworld magazine. In addition to ESPN/ X-Games coverage. --Wil540 art (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.