Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Marsden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Marsden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited from the fighters whose corner he's been in. Coverage is passing mentions, blogs, etc. Doesn't have significant independent coverage from multiple reliable sources.Mdtemp (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article gives no references and the external links are to blogs, podcasts, IMDB, etc. Currently I don't see the significant reliable coverage needed to show he meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no claim of notability in the article, it's mostly name-dropping and questionable sources Kraxler (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Couldn't find a single independent and reliable source about him. Clearly no extensive coverage available. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.