Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt King's Bloodhound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by JeremyA (talk · contribs). –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matt King's Bloodhound

unremarkable dog, ~~not eligible for speedy..Kinda sad that we could speedy Matt King as unremarkable, but the unremarkable man's unremarkable dog has to go through ProD, or AfD~~ WuhWuzDat 21:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Speedy A7 ~~and amend Speedy criteria A7 to include all named organic beings :)~~ Ray^Talk 21:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. ~~Clearly a speedy deletion candidate - by~~ A7 ~~as the dog is being used as a WP:COATRACK, or by G2/G3 or, failing that, WP:IAR!~~ I42 (talk) 21:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I'm the latest to spot A7 was updated to include animals. Is this article some kind of publicity stunt for that change? :-) I42 (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but it sure is bringing attention to the change! WuhWuzDat 22:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I speedied an article about a cat as A7. I was surprised that it was accepted. Joe Chill (talk) 00:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. No notability, no reliable sources. (My surprise came the other day when I noticed this revision of A7 on an article about an unremarkable horse.) Accounting4Taste:talk 22:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speed delete per all above. Accountant, why not use one of your magic buttons? Drmies (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we have articles on dogs now? Jeni ^(talk) 00:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure we do - Moose (dog actor) ? But good grief, this 'article' is as obvious a speedy delete as I've seen make it through to AFD in some time. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 00:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.