Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Craig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Rlendog (talk) 01:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Craig

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league baseball figure. Fails WP:BASE/N and WP:GNG. Alex (talk) 21:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. There are multiple, independent sources.--TM 21:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TM... Alex stop this madness please. Spanneraol (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - non-trivial sources from reliable organizations clearly pass WP:N. Nominator is showing little grasp of what the guideline actually comprises. — KV5 • Talk • 01:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep No guidelines violated as I can see, passes WP:GNG. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's getting to the point where I'm ready to vote Keep on anything Alex nominates, reflexively. This is looking more than a little pointy. Ravenswing 17:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep per above. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn. It seems to be snowing in here. Alex (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.