Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Corker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Corker[edit]

Matt Corker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a handful of appearances outside of Premiership Rugby and no indication of notability. Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:RU/N. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect - in process of updating entry. 240 appearances across premiership and championship rugby (2x winner), British & Irish cup winner. Coach across 2 national league rugby teams. 2A00:23C4:498E:6001:8119:2988:43DB:575B (talk) 20:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete There seems to be a good deal of coverage, however I'm not sure how much of this would pass WP:GNG. If someone can dig up some more interviews, then I'd be happy to reconsider, as there is some stuff out there. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Several sky sports and BBC articles have been added 185.104.136.31 (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Interview reference added and archived Wasps team profile also gives clear backing to early career standing 2A00:23C4:498E:6001:3407:C73:7F98:7C85 (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.