Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Brewer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sole keep argument is a bare assertion; the delete argument has more to offer. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Brewer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. — Za wl 15:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a notable musician.User:Soundsabound432 (talk) 22:25, 1 October 2017 (EST)
Delete no claim of notability, the references with non-trivial coverage appear to all be jazz-specific. The fact that he "placed third in the 2009 Thelonious Monk International Jazz Competition" isn't sufficient (or even relevant) for notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.