Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Barter
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matt Barter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating for procedural reasons, I know the article is well sourced but I am not sure it meets WIKI:GNG or WIKI:BIO.--IMR2000 (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:14, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning delete. My main concern here is WP:BLP1E: Barter seems to be an otherwise-low-profile person who's been in the news solely because of his involvement in a fairly minor controversy, which is exactly the situation in which BLP1E kicks in. I suppose restructuring this as an article about the event is a possible alternative to deletion, but since even the event's notability is uncertain (per WP:PERSISTENCE, WP:NOTNEWS, etc.) my instinct would be to delete outright. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:BLP1E. If Kenneth J. Harvey's documentary film gets over WP:NFILM when it comes out, then a bit of information about Barter would naturally be includable as part of that, but this isn't really claiming any credible reason why Barter would pass the ten year test for enduring international significance as a person. Bearcat (talk) 17:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.