Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathilde DeCagny
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --jonny-mt 02:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mathilde DeCagny[edit]
- Mathilde DeCagny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete Not independently notable per WP:BIO, just a dog trainer even if some of those dogs have become notable. Ave Caesar (talk) 17:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. —STTW (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Artcile needs to be expanded. Special dog training issues should be covered in the article, which actually make her trained dogs different and notable. I have added some references, would expand shortly. --STTW (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, while the dogs she has trained may be notable, she is not and does not deserve her own article. You have not provided any sources that make her the primary subject per WP:BIO. --Ave Caesar (talk) 21:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While some of her "clients" are noteworthy, they don't impart notability to her. A mention of her name in the dogs' articles will be sufficient.B.Wind (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability is not inherited. Are there any other cites out there? Bearian (talk) 22:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.