Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mateship Sunday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, per WP:SNOW. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mateship Sunday[edit]

A made up day. No sources provided. No evidence of existance Mattinbgn\^talk 09:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 09:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per nom. No sources to indicate this is nothing more than something somebody made up. -- Longhair\^talk 09:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Appears to be made up. Jonesy (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 09:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think this could probably have been speedied as random-made-up-thing. --Delirium (talk) 09:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
..Which isn't a speedy category. Ironholds (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I usually use db-nonsense for those, but maybe that's not kosher? Most "hey we thought this up in school" things do seem to get speedied one way or another. --Delirium (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense doesn't cover it, but there are certain administrators that use IAR in such situations. Personally I prefer to follow procedure. Ironholds (talk) 09:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Which is why I did not speedy it, despite the fact the article deserves speedying. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 10:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it wasn't a criticism of you. Ironholds (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No doubt written by a well-meaning editor, but still WP:MADEUP. WWGB (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP, / nom — Ched (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:SNOW.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 02:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.