Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matériel blanc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 04:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matériel blanc[edit]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Article was recreated after being deleted following WP:PROD. Rick Block (talk) 01:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Why not db-nocontext? --Evb-wiki 02:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was already prodded and re-created, so I'm treating it like a contested prod. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Evb-wiki, CSD A1. The nominator was correct to bring it here, and the next admin who sees this will be equally correct to send it back to oblivion. Yechiel Man 07:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, CSD A1 does not apply. There's plenty enough context to establish what the article is about, there's even a reference. The question is whether this stub about a future film is worthy of being an article (the proposed guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability (films) say no). I've brought up the general issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ("normal") - there is no IMDB or AMG listing for this film as of yet, and with only one solid reference, isn't really verifiable. Once it starts filming & more information available, then bring it back. SkierRMH 02:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.