Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masturbation cream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Personal lubricant. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Masturbation cream[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'vr declined a speedy deletion request on this, but it's clearly not appropriate for a Wikipedia page. Although it's demonstrable that these products exist, there's nothing I can see to suggest that any independent reliable source has even acknowledged their existence, let alone considered them significant enough to write about. ‑ Iridescent 17:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ‑ Iridescent 17:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has no citations at all. The dead links were all to retailers. The Personal lubricant article is the correct place for any remaining information. Thelisteninghand (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no coverage of the topic independent of the various companies selling the products, which is a good indication that it's not notable. At best a couple of lines could be merged to personal lubricant. Chagropango (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to personal lubricant. At least it deserves to be noted that these products are incompatible with latex. BD2412 T 19:08, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as op, don't count me twice, but there are no citations so there's nothing to merge. Hence why I expedited.Thelisteninghand (talk) 20:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't think merging is a good idea, for it sounds just like a marketing fork for a lubricant. --Suitskvarts (talk) 08:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Iridescent: I'm uncertain what happens next or when this discussion closes. This article is exactly as said above - a 'marketing fork' with brand names and a dead link to amazon. Can we delete now? Thelisteninghand (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.