Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massacres in Mamuret-ul-Aziz Vilayet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Massacres in Mamuret-ul-Aziz Vilayet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is some material in this article that can be used but it is not enough to substantiate a stand alone article. I see nothing but two sentences regarding Mamuret-ul-Aziz (Harput). Besides, why does Mamuret-ul-Aziz get its own article? Should we have articles for the massacres in the Vilayets of Van, Diyarbakir, Mush, Sivas as well? Best thing to do is move this to Armenian Genocide article Étienne Dolet (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also the article is full of things like this: "The first sign of danger was the appearance of Kurds supporting the Ottomans from the regions north and east. Villages were attacked, looted and burned, and villagers were killed or scattered. For a time, the marauders seemed to hold aloof from the city itself, but as they kept on their course of pillage their appetite for plunder was whetted, and they looked with avaricious eyes at the city on the hill.". It is not neutral. Sairp (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some important tidbits but article is too small and expansion does not seem warranted.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.