Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass Transit incident (ECW) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Transit incident (ECW)[edit]

This article is redundant since it is covered in the Extreme Championship Wrestling Lawsuit section. Also, the article is not noteworthy enough to deserve it's own entry. Kyros 23:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom; totally redundant. --Doc Tropics 01:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Alphachimp ^talk 07:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please note that this article has been listed for deletion previously, with the consensus of keep: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass transit incident. Aplomado ^talk 07:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep It was indeed a notable incident and it is probably a good idea to seperate out from the main article. And it survived an AFD in which is was agreeded upon being noteworthy. I don't think that has really changed. NegroSuave 16:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is a widely known incident but not much information is given on it elsewhere. Details on the incident are not easily found. Thus I believe it should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.224.252 (talk • contribs)
Keep I just stumbled across this article through a link on Blading (professional wrestling). It is highly informative and offers much more detail than the brief coverage in the ECW lawsuit section. It is not totally redundant. It is appropriately linked to by other articles. It is not advisable to link to sections, so even if this article's information were merged in to the ECW article there would still be a problem of linking. The incident is notable and stands as an e.g. of not trying things at home and how dangerous blading can be. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 08:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep significant event in professional wrestling. MLA 11:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant event in wrestling history.JB196 12:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is not redunant with the brief coverage in the main Extreme Championship Wrestling article, and was a significant event for all of professional wrestling, not just ECW. -Darryl Hamlin 04:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As said, this is very informitive with the dangers of underexperienced wrestlers wanting to just jump in the ring. -Filmmaster_13 08:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.