Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass Exodus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Exodus. TigerShark 23:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Exodus[edit]

This is a dicdef at best, although as written it is close to nonsense. Was prodded but removed so I'm bringing it here Kevin 11:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete that last line is bizarre. More importantly its clearly a dictionary definition. Wiktionary already has an entry for Exodus, I see no need to trouble it with a transwiki, certainly not with this content. Gwernol 11:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. DarthVad e r 11:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't we simply redirect it to Exodus? It's not at all an inconceivable search term, after all. -- Captain Disdain 12:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete current text per nom and redirect to exodus per Captain Disdain.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. --Xyra e l ^T 17:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to exodus. I must admit I liked this article though. I like how it states that not just people and animals but objects can have an exodus, which would make a great The Far Side cartoon. The last line is truly unforgettable: "It’s not an exodus unless it’s a mass exodus." Darn right! Accept no substitutes! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect per my prod. Morgan Wick 22:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear dicdef. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 23:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Exodus. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Coredesat 01:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Exodus, the second book of the Torah and the Christian Bible. --Starionwolf 03:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.