Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason interlandi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Enigma^msg 06:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mason interlandi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO, particularly WP:ATHLETE. While the league given is a notable one (as is the team) it's a bit of a red herring, since as of october he was playing for the under 15s. Ironholds (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE. Separately, no results here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable junior player and it's not the first time this has been created - see the logs at Mason Interlandi. Do we have a CSD/sockpuppet case in this too?The-Pope (talk) 23:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:ATH: the Victorian Premier League is not fully professional and in any case he seems to be a junior. Obviously fails WP:BIO by a long way. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 06:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails WP:ATHLETE, not to mention that the capitalisation is wrong. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both WP:ATH and WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 22:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE until he plays at a fully professional level; youth sides, etc. are not enough to qualify for inclusion. Cocytus [»talk«] 03:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: for the same reasons that the page has been deleted four times previously but is perenially recreated by someone who loves himself just a bit too much. Fails just about every guideline going: ATHLETE, GNG, BIO et cetera. -- Big Dom 21:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.