Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashflob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 22:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mashflob

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Extremely few reliable sources. Request AfD. Thanks. ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 14:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP OK the most responsible reason to keep this listing is the ability of the web to bring people together. It's not really notable, not really used by huge numbers of people, i.e. FACEBOOK, but the site has brought together some groups to do novel and some hopefully unique activities. If the internet, and Wiki, and in a small way, this web site, and therefore this listing can make the world closer and friendlier, then by golly, what's a couple meg of server space and a link? Or more likely, if this drops off Wiki, then the hope for a free web where people make new things happen, even those that don't generate revenue, i.e. taxes, will turn into a corporate 'big brother' nightmare. Well, somewhere in between Freedom in Fields of Flowers and Slavery to Corporate Masters is the space we all like to live in and MashFlob needs to be here with us! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.110.69.40 (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's promotional of the website, and lacks notability. Nuujinn (talk) 00:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:WEB. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources in the article are all trivial mentions, I could not find significant coverage. Jujutacular ^T · C 18:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.