Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Marques
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Portuguese supercentenarians. MBisanz talk 03:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Mary Marques (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If not notable, List of Portuguese supercentenarians contains mini-bios of other similarly-long-lived people, so you could merge there, but while living to 100 isn't enough to be notable, 110 is more impressive. --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I believe the standing consensus is that supercentenarians are not presumptively notable; they have to meet the requirements of WP:BIO in their own right. Ravenswing 06:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Portuguese supercentenarians. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.