Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Lambert (restaurant)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mary Lambert (restaurant)[edit]
- Mary Lambert (restaurant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local business that appears to fail notability standards. Sources cited in article are local (Hartlepool Mail), or not independent of subject (two client profiles in small trade journals). A Google search turns up the founder's obituary in the Mail, the restaurant's own website, some Facebook pages, and lots of directory entries, but nothing suggestive of in-depth coverage by independent sources outside of Hartlepool. Searches on Google News and Google News Archives yield no evidence of such coverage. Ammodramus (talk) 12:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nomination, unremarkable business, no significant non-local coverage.TheLongTone (talk) 14:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It seems this restaurant is very well known in Hartlepool but I haven't found any national or international coverage and that's fine, not all restaurants receive the best coverage. However, I found some other local coverage here (minor mention through a health incident), here (minor mention through employee), here (regarding the restaurant's smoking policy) and here (minor mention for taxes). I'm sure this is a good restaurant but it is not notable for Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete May be a decent local restaurant but no evidence of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As far as I know there is no recommended notability guideline for restaurants. By default WP:GNG, I would say the independent and widespread coverage of this business does not seem enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Mkdwtalk 03:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- merely a NN restaurant or bakery. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete inappropriate advert for a non-notable local cafe. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.