Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Jane Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Jane Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced BLP; multiple attempts at prod. Jack Merridew 18:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unreferenced WP:BLP. Guy (Help!) 19:40, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as unreferenced BLP. (unreferenced BLP articles should be a criteria for CSD) JBsupreme (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's an easily surmountable problem: see [1]. But Delete because she doesn't appear to meet the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Holly25 (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the nom. has been prodding a number of articles as "unreferenced BLP without checking them--even those with prizes that were already specified in the article--I have been checking some, & if they seem possibly worthwhile, adding the refs. & deprodding. Perhaps we should consider the mere assertion "unsourced" as a deletion reason to be not acceptable for listing a AfD, and insist on a statement of a valid deletion reason, such as unsourceable. (I have no comment here on this person's actually notability) DGG ( talk ) 23:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't pass any of the notability guidelines, no reliable sources from which to cobble together a proper biography, and there's chance for great harm to be done with these unwatched and unmaintained blps.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreferenced BLP with no notability. Viridae ^Talk 05:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails PORNBIO Hipocrite (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.