Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Alexandra Stiefvater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Alexandra Stiefvater

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very nicely formatted page with a number of references, but it doesn't look like this actress is notable. She's had some bit parts here and there and some indie work, but nothing much. References are to her IMDB page, sites affiliated with her, and sites of movies she's appeared in. Only two google news hits and they are just passing mentions. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:19, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - As for the Afd, I'm undecided, but do agree that the referencing in this article is very weak. -- WikHead (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. She doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR (her most prominent role appears to be starring in what our film article calls a "Z movie"), and I don't see much coverage out there. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the roles this person has played do not appear to qualify as "significant roles", the films she produced herself don't seem to be carried anywhere, and her books are self-published. --❨Ṩtruthious ℬandersnatch❩ 22:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage. Fails WP:ENT. SL93 (talk) 01:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.