Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marxism (journal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Marxism (journal)

Marxism (journal) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

non-notable, low circulation annual publication. General Idea 21:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• delete per nom, seems to have been published only twice (2003/2004) see:[1]. Arnoutf 22:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, 2 issues in 5 years = non-notable. SkierRMH,07:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Please, check out an article before assuming it to be needless: International Socialists (Canada) is a most decent quality article that mentions the publication in the intro section. An annual publication is not less notable than a daily newspaper, else we could not keep articles on any one-time events either. Such publications normally have in-depth articles or handle one or a few topics very thoroughly. The number of members of trozkist organizations is typically minute in western countries, but a publication like this is just as typically read by the theoreticians (think-tanks) of the larger left-wing parties, and thus indirectly but sometimes considerably influences public debate. The article at hand is required so as to avoid the forementioned article to needlessly grow, as Wikipedia does not work with subarticles. — SomeHuman 15 Jan2007 09:14 (UTC)
  • Merge it with International Socialists (Canada) then. There isn't enough here to merit an article on its own and I see no evidence that the annual has any of the influence you speculate about on theoriticians, thinktanks, or larger left-wing parties. Can you list any theoritician, academic or larger party who has cited an Marxism article for some purpose? General Idea 01:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  10:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 13:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.