Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Comics film History
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Marvel Comics film History[edit]
- Marvel Comics film History (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
All this information (and a lot more) is already in the relevant Spider Man movie articles. There is no reason to duplicate this information in a separate article and no reason to believe this article can be anything but a fork of the main movie articles. Prod was removed without comment. Gwernol 03:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This info is already in the Spider-Man movie articles. TJ Spyke 04:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment shouldn't the scope of the article include a lot more than just one Spider Man movie? wtfunkymonkey 05:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It originally included the first two movies, but the author removed one while removing the prod notice. Even if it covered more than the 3 Spider Man movies, it would still be only redundant information as all the movies have their own article already and are part of the List of films based on Marvel Comics. Gwernol 05:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Misleading title. MER-C 06:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense. Articles shouldn't look like a forum comments. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 06:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Article is inaccurately named, incorrectly capitalized. Information is redundant to other articles. I really have to wonder if User:EJBanks deliberately creates articles and categories for the fun of getting them deleted. This user creates a lot of categories and a number of articles. They all get nominated for deletion, and I have yet to see one that did not have a clear consensus to delete. Doczilla 06:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Until someone wants to redo with all of the films. Moscatanix 15:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom — J Greb 23:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.