Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Warner (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Talkbiznow. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Warner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP that has external links to subject's own sites, but lacks third-party sources to establish notability. Article about same subject was previously deleted at AFD in 2008, but speedy deletion as a recreation was declined. RL0919 (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (or merge) to Talkbiznow. It is probably the most sensible outcome at the moment. There is some coverage in the reliable media, but not enough for a stand alone article. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable Victuallers (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After testing various combinations of the subjects name and affiliations through Google News, it's clear that the story here is Talkbiznow, not Warner; merge/redirect is the obvious choice. Deletion is not viable, as Warner is a verifiably noteworthy aspect of the topic of Talkbiznow. Skomorokh 06:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, although I nominated this as a deletion, I have no objection to a merger. --RL0919 (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article centers around Talkbiznow anyway, a merge with the Talkbiznow article looks like the most reasonable thing to go for. Airplaneman ✈ 15:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Martin Warner (bishop), a notable figure of this name.Neddyseagoon - talk 16:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.