Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Mawyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Christian Action Network. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Mawyer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not-notable chairperson. Fails WP:GNG. Night of the Big Wind _talk 19:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. He is a major activist leader whose campaigns have received nationwide attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.6.52 (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If he is so important, why does he score only 25.000 internet hits and 0 (zero) on Google News? And sorry, I can not see Fox News and their own website as reliable third party sources. Night of the Big Wind _talk 19:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get 274 hits by clicking on the Google News link provided above. You seem to be looking only at the recent hits, rather than the archive. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG; lack of significant secondary coverage. AV3000 (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources found by the Google News archive and Google Books searches automatically linked by the nomination process demonstrate a very clear pass of the general notability guideline. There is an editorial decision to be made as to whether this should be merged with Christian Action Network, but that is a matter for normal editing and talk page discussion rather than anything requiring an admin to press the "delete" button. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Christian Action Network. That organisation is (subject to its own AfD) apparently notable enough, but not massively notable. Being CEO of it doesn't make him sufficiently notable without more - we are not talking about an organisation like the American Red Cross or Medicins San Frontieres here. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 16:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 22:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect to Christian Action Network, per WP:BLP1E. Cavarrone (talk) 11:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Christian Action Network, as it's apparently survived AfD - he doesn't have notability independent of his organization. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.